EFEITOS DA INTERAÇÃO HUMANO-ANIMAL NO BEM-ESTAR DE RUMINANTES LEITEIROS: UMA REVISÃO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2020.v27.497Palavras-chave:
boas práticas de manejo, comportamento, produção de leiteResumo
O bem-estar dos animais de produção vem recebendo crescente atenção à medida que os consumidores têm se mostrado mais preocupados com a maneira como os animais de produção são tratados. Nesse sentido, a interação humano-animal tem importância na produção agropecuária, pois a preocupação em melhorar o bem-estar animal está diretamente relacionada à melhoria na rotina de manejo das fazendas. Além disso, é comprovado cientificamente que a relação humano-animal tem potencial para causar impactos positivos ou negativos na produtividade e no bem-estar das diferentes espécies dos animais de produção. Dessa maneira, a relação entre a interação humano-animal e o bem-estar dos animais de produção leiteira são discutidos nessa revisão, com o propósito de mostrar a importância da implantação das boas práticas no manejo de ruminantes leiteiros.
Referências
1. Broom DM. Animal welfare in the European Union. Directorate-General for Internal Policies (Policy Department, Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs). Brussels [internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jan] Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/583114/IPOL_STU(2017)583114_EN.pdf.
2. Broom DM. Animal welfare: An aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2010;37(1):83-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.37.1.83
3. Broom DM. Animal welfare complementing or conflicting with other sustainability issues. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;219:104829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.06.010
4. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL. The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2002;80(1):68-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80168x
5. Baxter EM, Mulligan J, Hall SA, Donbavand JE, Palme R, Aldujaili E, Zanella A, Dwyer CM. Positive and negative gestational handling influences placental traits and mother-offspring behavior in dairy goats. Physiol. Behav. 2016;157:129-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.001
6. Jago JG, Krohn CC, Matthews LR. The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human-animal interactions in young cattle. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;62(2-3):137-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00219-6
7. Lensink BJ, Boivin X, Pradel P, Le Neindre P, Veisser I. Reducing veal calves’ reactivity to people by providing additional human contact. J. Anim. Sci. 2000a;78(5):1213-1218. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851213x
8. Lensink BJ, Fernadez X, Boivin X, Pradel P, Le Neindre P, Veisser I. The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2000b;78(5):1219-1226. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851219x
9. Polikarpus A, Napolitano F, Grasso F, Di Palo R, Zicarelli F, Arney D, De Rosa G. Effect of pre-partum habituation to milking routine on behaviour and lactation performance of buffalo heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014;161:1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.10.003
10. Broom DM. Indicators of poor welfare. Br. Vet. J. [internet]. 1986;142(6):524-526. Available from: https://endcap.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Broom-1986-Indicators-of-poor-animal-welfare.pdf
11. Broom DM, Molento CFM. Bem-estar animal: conceito e questões relacionadas – revisão. Arch. Vet.Sci. [internet]. 2004;9(2):1-11. Available from: https://revistas.ufpr.br/veterinary/article/viewFile/4057/3287
12. Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. The Welfare Quality® Project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta. Agr. Scand. A-An. 2010;60(3):129-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2010.523480
13. Mellor DJ, Reid CSW. Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals. [internet]. 1994. Available from: https://animalstudiesrepository.org/exprawel/7/
14. OIE (World Organization for Animal Health). Introduction to the recommendations for animal welfare. In. OIE -Terrestrial Animal Health Code, Section 7 (Animal Welfare), Chapter 7.1. [internet]. 2019 Available from:
https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_introduction.pdf.
15. Boivin X, Le Neidre P, Chupin JM. Establishment of cattle–human relationships. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992;32(4):325-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80025-5
16. Hemsworth PH. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;81(3):185-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0
17. de Passillé AM, Rusehn J, Ladewig J, Petherick C. Dairy calves discrimination of people based on previous handling. J. Anim. Sci. 1996;74(5):969-974. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.745969x
18. Honorato LA, Hotzel MJ, de Miranda Gomes CC, Silveira IDB, Machado Filho LCP. Particularities of the human-animal interactions relevant to the welfare and productivity of dairy cows. Cienc. Rural. 2012;42(2):332-340.
19. Waiblinger S, Bovin X, Perdersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;101(3-4):185–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
20. Rushen J, Taylor AA, de Passilé AA. Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;65(3):285–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00089-1
21. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Coleman GJ. The human-animal relationship in agriculture and its consequences for the animal. Anim. Welf. 1993;2(1):33-51.
22. Grandin T. Solving livestock handling problems. Vet. Med. [internet]. 1994;89(10):989-998. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Temple_Grandin/publication/266589526_Solving_livestock_handling_problems_Solving_livestock_handling_problems/links/5559eebc08aeaaff3bfab46f.pdf
23. Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000;66(4):273-288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0
24. Rosa MS, Paranhos da Costa MJR. O reflexo da interação amigável entre humanos e bovinos no bem-estar na fazenda. In: Anais do 6º Congresso Brasileiro de Raças Zebuínas; 2005, Uberaba, Uberaba: ABCZ; 2005. p.71-79.
25. Munksgaard L, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Thodberg K, Jensen MB. Discrimination of People by Dairy Cows Based on Handling. J. Dairy Sci. 1997;80(6):1106–1112. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76036-3
26. Kilgour R, Dalton C. Livestock Behaviour. A Practical Guide. London: Granada Publishing; 1984.
27. Silva CMD, Furtado DA, Medeiros AND, Saraiva EP, Guimarães MCDC, Tota LDCA, Lopes KBDP. Ethogram of three genetic groups of goats confined using monitoring video images. Rev. Etol. 2013;12(1):1-11. Available from: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-28052013000100001
28. Nawroth C. Invited review: Socio-cognitive capacities of goats and their impact on human-animal interactions. Small Rumin. Res. 2017;150:70-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.03.005
29. Langbein J, Siebert K, Nürnberg G. On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: Do goats seek cognitive challenges? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;120(3-4):150–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.006
30. Langbein J, Nürnberg G, Manteuffel G. Visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats and associated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability. Physiol. Behav. 2004;82(4):601–609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.007
31. Langbein J, Siebert K, Nuernberg G. Concurrent recall of serially learned visual discrimination problems in dwarf goats (Capra hircus). Behav. Processes. 2008;79(3):156-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.004
32. Keil NM, Imfeld-Mueller S, Aschwanden J, Wechsler B. Are head cues necessary for goats (Capra hircus) in recognising group members? Anim. Cogn. 2012;15(5):913–921. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-012-0518-6
33. Briefer EF, Padilla de la Torre M, McElligott AG. Mother goats do not forget their kids’ calls. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2012;279(1743):3749-3755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0986
34. Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M. Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim. Behav. 2005;69(1):11–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.008
35. Miller DW, Fleming PA, Barnes AL, Wickham SL, Collins T, Stockman CA. Behavioural assessment of the habituation of feral rangeland goats to an intensive farming system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;199:1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.001
36. Ceballos MC, Sant’Anna AC. Evolução da ciência do bem-estar animal: aspectos conceituais e metodológicos. Rev. Acad. Cienc. Anim. [internet]. 2018;16:1-24. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria_Ceballos7/publication/326008168_Evolucao_da_ciencia_do_bem-estar_animal_Uma_breve_revisao_sobre_aspectos_conceituais_e_metodologicos/links/5b85cc5692851c1e1238dac2/Evolucao-da-ciencia-do-bem-estar-animal-Uma-breve-revisao-sobre-aspectos-conceituais-e-metodologicos.pdf
37. Gonzaléz-Pech PG, Marín-Tun CG, Valladares-González DA, Ventura-Cordero J, Ortíz-Ocampo GI, Cámara-Sarmiento R, Sandoval-Castro CA, Torres-Acosta JFJ. A protocolo f human animal interaction to habituate young sheep and goats for behavioural studies. Behav. Proc. 2018;157:632-637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.007
38. Thomas CS, Bruckmaier RM, Östensson K, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. Effect of different milking routines on milking related release of the hormones oxytocin, prolactin and cortisol, and on milk yield and milking performance in Murrah buffaloes. J. Dairy. Res. 2005;72(1):10-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029904000457
39. Barbosa Neto JD, Bastianetto E. Diferenças fisiológicas entre bubalinos e bovinos: interferência na produção. Ciênc. anim. bras. [Internet]. 6º de outubro de 2009 [citado 19º de julho de 2020];10. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/7664
40. Carvalhal MVL, Costa FO. Produção e bem-estar de búfalas (Bubalus bubalis) leiteiras: uma revisão. Rev. Acad. Cienc. Anim. [internet]. 2018;16:1-10. Disponível em: https://www.bufalo.com.br/home/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dramonique.pdf
41. Saltalamacchia F, Tripaldi C, Castellano A, Napolitano F, Musto M, De Rosa G. Human and animal behaviour in dairy buffalo at milking. Anim. Welf. [internet]. 2007;16(2):139. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Giuseppe_Rosa/publication/233583710_Human_and_animal_behaviour_in_dairy_buffalo_at_milking/links/09e4150c853a30ad44000000/Human-and-animal-behaviour-in-dairy-buffalo-at-milking.pdf
42. De Rosa G, Napolitano F, Grasso F, Pacelli C, Bordi A. On the development of a monitoring scheme of buffalo welfare at farm level. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2005;4(2):115-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2005.115
43. Kutzer T, Steilen M, Gygax L, Wechsler B. Habituation of dairy heifers to milking routine—Effects on human avoidance distance, behavior, and cardiac activity during milking. J. Dairy. Sci. 2015;98(8):5241-5251. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8773
44. Jackson KMA, Hackett D. A note: The effects of human handling on heart girth, behaviour and milk quality in dairy goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;108(3-4):332-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.011
45. Silva LP, Sant’anna AC, Silva LCM, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Long-term effects of good handling practices during the pre-weaning period of crossbred dairy heifer calves. Trop. Anim. Health. Pro. [internet]. 2017;49(1):153-162. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11250-016-1174-7
46. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Coleman G. The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics, behavior of stockpeople, subsequent behavior, and production of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;79(3):195-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7
47. Levine S, Haltmeyer GC, Karas GG, Denenberg VH. Physiological and behavioral effects of infantile stimulation. Physiol. Behav. 1967;2(1):55-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(67)90011-X
48. Smith FV, Nott KH. The ‘critical period’ in relation to the strength of the stimulus. Z. Tierpsychol. 1970;27:108-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1970.tb01865.x
49. Magalhães Silva LC. Avaliação dos benefícios da adoção de boas práticas de manejo no bem-estar de bezerros leiteiros [tese]. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2015.
50. Kurowasa M, Lundeberg T, Agren G, Lund I, Uvnas-Moberg K. Massage-like stroking of the abdomen lowers blood pressure in anesthetized rats: Influence of oxytocin. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 1995;56(1-2):26-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1838(95)00056-7
51. Lynch JJ, Frederick Fregin G, Mackie JB, Monroe Jr RR. Heart rate changes in the horse to human contact. Psychophysiology. 1974;11(4):472-478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00575.x
52. Schmied C, Waiblinger S, Scharl T, Leisch F, Boivin X. Stroking of different body regions by a human: Effects on behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;109(1):25-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.013
53. Andrioli M. Efeito da estimulação tátil no bem-estar de cabritos leiteiros [trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2018.
54. Valente PP, Almeida DHS, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Técnica da estimulação multissensorial em bezerras Girolando. In: Anais do Encontro Anual de Etologia; 2016, Jaboticabal. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias; 2016. p.105.
55. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Korff J, Bucher A. Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;85(1-2):31-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.07.002
56. Arave CW, Mickelsen CH, Walters JL. Effect of early rearing experience on subsequent behavior and production of Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68(4):923-929. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80910-3
57. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Hansen C. The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987;17(3-4):245-252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(87)90149-3
58. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL. Relationships between fear of humans, productivity and cage position of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1989;30(3):505-518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417175
2. Broom DM. Animal welfare: An aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2010;37(1):83-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.37.1.83
3. Broom DM. Animal welfare complementing or conflicting with other sustainability issues. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;219:104829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.06.010
4. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL. The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2002;80(1):68-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80168x
5. Baxter EM, Mulligan J, Hall SA, Donbavand JE, Palme R, Aldujaili E, Zanella A, Dwyer CM. Positive and negative gestational handling influences placental traits and mother-offspring behavior in dairy goats. Physiol. Behav. 2016;157:129-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.001
6. Jago JG, Krohn CC, Matthews LR. The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human-animal interactions in young cattle. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;62(2-3):137-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00219-6
7. Lensink BJ, Boivin X, Pradel P, Le Neindre P, Veisser I. Reducing veal calves’ reactivity to people by providing additional human contact. J. Anim. Sci. 2000a;78(5):1213-1218. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851213x
8. Lensink BJ, Fernadez X, Boivin X, Pradel P, Le Neindre P, Veisser I. The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2000b;78(5):1219-1226. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851219x
9. Polikarpus A, Napolitano F, Grasso F, Di Palo R, Zicarelli F, Arney D, De Rosa G. Effect of pre-partum habituation to milking routine on behaviour and lactation performance of buffalo heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014;161:1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.10.003
10. Broom DM. Indicators of poor welfare. Br. Vet. J. [internet]. 1986;142(6):524-526. Available from: https://endcap.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Broom-1986-Indicators-of-poor-animal-welfare.pdf
11. Broom DM, Molento CFM. Bem-estar animal: conceito e questões relacionadas – revisão. Arch. Vet.Sci. [internet]. 2004;9(2):1-11. Available from: https://revistas.ufpr.br/veterinary/article/viewFile/4057/3287
12. Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. The Welfare Quality® Project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta. Agr. Scand. A-An. 2010;60(3):129-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2010.523480
13. Mellor DJ, Reid CSW. Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals. [internet]. 1994. Available from: https://animalstudiesrepository.org/exprawel/7/
14. OIE (World Organization for Animal Health). Introduction to the recommendations for animal welfare. In. OIE -Terrestrial Animal Health Code, Section 7 (Animal Welfare), Chapter 7.1. [internet]. 2019 Available from:
https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_introduction.pdf.
15. Boivin X, Le Neidre P, Chupin JM. Establishment of cattle–human relationships. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992;32(4):325-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80025-5
16. Hemsworth PH. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;81(3):185-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0
17. de Passillé AM, Rusehn J, Ladewig J, Petherick C. Dairy calves discrimination of people based on previous handling. J. Anim. Sci. 1996;74(5):969-974. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.745969x
18. Honorato LA, Hotzel MJ, de Miranda Gomes CC, Silveira IDB, Machado Filho LCP. Particularities of the human-animal interactions relevant to the welfare and productivity of dairy cows. Cienc. Rural. 2012;42(2):332-340.
19. Waiblinger S, Bovin X, Perdersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;101(3-4):185–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
20. Rushen J, Taylor AA, de Passilé AA. Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;65(3):285–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00089-1
21. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Coleman GJ. The human-animal relationship in agriculture and its consequences for the animal. Anim. Welf. 1993;2(1):33-51.
22. Grandin T. Solving livestock handling problems. Vet. Med. [internet]. 1994;89(10):989-998. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Temple_Grandin/publication/266589526_Solving_livestock_handling_problems_Solving_livestock_handling_problems/links/5559eebc08aeaaff3bfab46f.pdf
23. Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000;66(4):273-288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0
24. Rosa MS, Paranhos da Costa MJR. O reflexo da interação amigável entre humanos e bovinos no bem-estar na fazenda. In: Anais do 6º Congresso Brasileiro de Raças Zebuínas; 2005, Uberaba, Uberaba: ABCZ; 2005. p.71-79.
25. Munksgaard L, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Thodberg K, Jensen MB. Discrimination of People by Dairy Cows Based on Handling. J. Dairy Sci. 1997;80(6):1106–1112. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76036-3
26. Kilgour R, Dalton C. Livestock Behaviour. A Practical Guide. London: Granada Publishing; 1984.
27. Silva CMD, Furtado DA, Medeiros AND, Saraiva EP, Guimarães MCDC, Tota LDCA, Lopes KBDP. Ethogram of three genetic groups of goats confined using monitoring video images. Rev. Etol. 2013;12(1):1-11. Available from: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-28052013000100001
28. Nawroth C. Invited review: Socio-cognitive capacities of goats and their impact on human-animal interactions. Small Rumin. Res. 2017;150:70-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.03.005
29. Langbein J, Siebert K, Nürnberg G. On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: Do goats seek cognitive challenges? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;120(3-4):150–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.006
30. Langbein J, Nürnberg G, Manteuffel G. Visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats and associated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability. Physiol. Behav. 2004;82(4):601–609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.007
31. Langbein J, Siebert K, Nuernberg G. Concurrent recall of serially learned visual discrimination problems in dwarf goats (Capra hircus). Behav. Processes. 2008;79(3):156-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.004
32. Keil NM, Imfeld-Mueller S, Aschwanden J, Wechsler B. Are head cues necessary for goats (Capra hircus) in recognising group members? Anim. Cogn. 2012;15(5):913–921. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-012-0518-6
33. Briefer EF, Padilla de la Torre M, McElligott AG. Mother goats do not forget their kids’ calls. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2012;279(1743):3749-3755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0986
34. Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M. Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim. Behav. 2005;69(1):11–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.008
35. Miller DW, Fleming PA, Barnes AL, Wickham SL, Collins T, Stockman CA. Behavioural assessment of the habituation of feral rangeland goats to an intensive farming system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;199:1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.001
36. Ceballos MC, Sant’Anna AC. Evolução da ciência do bem-estar animal: aspectos conceituais e metodológicos. Rev. Acad. Cienc. Anim. [internet]. 2018;16:1-24. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maria_Ceballos7/publication/326008168_Evolucao_da_ciencia_do_bem-estar_animal_Uma_breve_revisao_sobre_aspectos_conceituais_e_metodologicos/links/5b85cc5692851c1e1238dac2/Evolucao-da-ciencia-do-bem-estar-animal-Uma-breve-revisao-sobre-aspectos-conceituais-e-metodologicos.pdf
37. Gonzaléz-Pech PG, Marín-Tun CG, Valladares-González DA, Ventura-Cordero J, Ortíz-Ocampo GI, Cámara-Sarmiento R, Sandoval-Castro CA, Torres-Acosta JFJ. A protocolo f human animal interaction to habituate young sheep and goats for behavioural studies. Behav. Proc. 2018;157:632-637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.007
38. Thomas CS, Bruckmaier RM, Östensson K, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. Effect of different milking routines on milking related release of the hormones oxytocin, prolactin and cortisol, and on milk yield and milking performance in Murrah buffaloes. J. Dairy. Res. 2005;72(1):10-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029904000457
39. Barbosa Neto JD, Bastianetto E. Diferenças fisiológicas entre bubalinos e bovinos: interferência na produção. Ciênc. anim. bras. [Internet]. 6º de outubro de 2009 [citado 19º de julho de 2020];10. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/7664
40. Carvalhal MVL, Costa FO. Produção e bem-estar de búfalas (Bubalus bubalis) leiteiras: uma revisão. Rev. Acad. Cienc. Anim. [internet]. 2018;16:1-10. Disponível em: https://www.bufalo.com.br/home/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dramonique.pdf
41. Saltalamacchia F, Tripaldi C, Castellano A, Napolitano F, Musto M, De Rosa G. Human and animal behaviour in dairy buffalo at milking. Anim. Welf. [internet]. 2007;16(2):139. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Giuseppe_Rosa/publication/233583710_Human_and_animal_behaviour_in_dairy_buffalo_at_milking/links/09e4150c853a30ad44000000/Human-and-animal-behaviour-in-dairy-buffalo-at-milking.pdf
42. De Rosa G, Napolitano F, Grasso F, Pacelli C, Bordi A. On the development of a monitoring scheme of buffalo welfare at farm level. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2005;4(2):115-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2005.115
43. Kutzer T, Steilen M, Gygax L, Wechsler B. Habituation of dairy heifers to milking routine—Effects on human avoidance distance, behavior, and cardiac activity during milking. J. Dairy. Sci. 2015;98(8):5241-5251. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8773
44. Jackson KMA, Hackett D. A note: The effects of human handling on heart girth, behaviour and milk quality in dairy goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;108(3-4):332-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.011
45. Silva LP, Sant’anna AC, Silva LCM, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Long-term effects of good handling practices during the pre-weaning period of crossbred dairy heifer calves. Trop. Anim. Health. Pro. [internet]. 2017;49(1):153-162. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11250-016-1174-7
46. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Coleman G. The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics, behavior of stockpeople, subsequent behavior, and production of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;79(3):195-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7
47. Levine S, Haltmeyer GC, Karas GG, Denenberg VH. Physiological and behavioral effects of infantile stimulation. Physiol. Behav. 1967;2(1):55-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(67)90011-X
48. Smith FV, Nott KH. The ‘critical period’ in relation to the strength of the stimulus. Z. Tierpsychol. 1970;27:108-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1970.tb01865.x
49. Magalhães Silva LC. Avaliação dos benefícios da adoção de boas práticas de manejo no bem-estar de bezerros leiteiros [tese]. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2015.
50. Kurowasa M, Lundeberg T, Agren G, Lund I, Uvnas-Moberg K. Massage-like stroking of the abdomen lowers blood pressure in anesthetized rats: Influence of oxytocin. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 1995;56(1-2):26-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1838(95)00056-7
51. Lynch JJ, Frederick Fregin G, Mackie JB, Monroe Jr RR. Heart rate changes in the horse to human contact. Psychophysiology. 1974;11(4):472-478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00575.x
52. Schmied C, Waiblinger S, Scharl T, Leisch F, Boivin X. Stroking of different body regions by a human: Effects on behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;109(1):25-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.013
53. Andrioli M. Efeito da estimulação tátil no bem-estar de cabritos leiteiros [trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2018.
54. Valente PP, Almeida DHS, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Técnica da estimulação multissensorial em bezerras Girolando. In: Anais do Encontro Anual de Etologia; 2016, Jaboticabal. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias; 2016. p.105.
55. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Korff J, Bucher A. Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;85(1-2):31-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.07.002
56. Arave CW, Mickelsen CH, Walters JL. Effect of early rearing experience on subsequent behavior and production of Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68(4):923-929. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80910-3
57. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Hansen C. The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987;17(3-4):245-252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(87)90149-3
58. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL. Relationships between fear of humans, productivity and cage position of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1989;30(3):505-518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417175
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
2020-12-08
Como Citar
1.
Andrioli M, Carvalhal M, Costa F, Paranhos da Costa M. EFEITOS DA INTERAÇÃO HUMANO-ANIMAL NO BEM-ESTAR DE RUMINANTES LEITEIROS: UMA REVISÃO. RVZ [Internet]. 8º de dezembro de 2020 [citado 21º de dezembro de 2024];27:1-14. Disponível em: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/497
Edição
Seção
Artigos de Revisão
Licença
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
