AVALIAÇÃO IN VIVO DE DIFERENTES DILUENTES COMERCIAIS NA REPRODUÇÃO DE GALOS DA RAÇA ÍNDIO GIGANTE (Gallus Gallus Domesticus)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2025.v32.1684

Keywords:

Poultry production, biotechnology, artificial insemination, reproductive management

Abstract

Because of the growing demand for Indio Gigante birds, whether for meat, laying and especially as ornamental birds, the breed's reproduction has been intensified. Many Índio Gigante producers are already using Artificial Insemination (AI) to improve the breed's desirable characteristics. However, the AI performed by most producers is still empirical and without much theoretical basis. The use of refrigerated semen from roosters is an alternative for breeders looking to overcome the distances in Brazilian territory, increasing viability time and allowing the transportation of genetic material. There are some specific diluents for poultry, but they need to be formulated in a laboratory or imported from other countries. Identifying a commercial diluent for other species that allows the use of semen from genetically superior roosters to be optimized would be beneficial for the production chain of the giant Indio rooster. For the experiment, 10 Indio Gigante roosters were used to evaluate commercial semen diluents used in other domestic animal species: Optidux®, Botudog Turbo®, BotuBov® and Botusêmen Special® and pure semen. After collection, a pool of semen was made and an aliquot was taken for analysis of seminal characteristics (color, volume, vigor, concentration, mass movement, sperm motility and cell defects).The sample was then split into five 15 mL falcon tubes and diluted with the different diluents and refrigerated for 12 hours. The samples were kept in a specific box for storing semen (Botuflex®) at 5 ºC. To assess the fertility rate and hatchability, 70 laying hens of the Embrapa 051 strain were used, divided into 5 groups of 14 animals each. The hens were inseminated with a single dose of refrigerated semen from each treatment. The eggs were collected 14 days after artificial insemination and incubated to assess fertility and hatchability. The fertility rate of the treatments evaluated was 32.61%; 7.79%; 2.04%; 0%; and 0%; for the diluents Botusêmen Special®, Pure Semen, Botudog Turbo®, Optidux® and Botubov® respectively. The hatchability rate was 85.27%; 59.26%; 22.22%; 0%; and 0%; for the diluents Botusêmen Special®, Pure Semen, Botudog Turbo®, Optidux® and Botubov® respectively. The Botusêmen Special® diluent had a fertility and hatchability rate of 32.61% and 85.27% respectively, higher than the other diluents tested in this study.

Author Biographies

Flavio Lopes Claudio, Instituto Federal Goiano

Instituto Federal Goiano

Wagner Azis Garcia de Araújo, Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais

Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais

References

Tvrdá E, Petrovičová M, Benko F, Ďuračka M, Kováč J, Slanina T, et al. Seminal Bacterioflora of Two Rooster Lines: Characterization, Antibiotic Resistance Patterns and Possible Impact on Semen Quality. Antibiotics. fevereiro de 2023;12(2):336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020336

Serpa FC, Jácome IMTD, Garcia RG, Zanchin LF, Somavila EM, Molinari M, et al. Inseminação artificial em codornas através de diferentes métodos de coleta de sêmen. Pesqui Soc E Desenvolv. 2020;9(4):e88942789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2789

Habibullah M, organizador. Effect of Artificial Insemination on different production parameter in Hubbard classic broiler parent stock. J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2015;13(1):71–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v13i1.28720

Ewuola EO, Ogundeji KT, Osanyinlusi TM, Oyedele DM, Adebisi KA, Bolarinwa OA. Effects of semen dosage, oviductal sperm storage and insemination interval on egg fertility, embryo mortality and hatchability in Nera Black breeder chickens. Niger J Anim Prod. 17 de dezembro de 2020;47(3):34–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v47i3.134

Łukaszewicz E, Jerysz A, Kowalczyk A. Effect of semen extenders on viability of ISA Brown and Hubbard Flex roosters’ sperm stored for 24 h. Poult Sci. 1o de maio de 2020;99(5):2766–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.055

Castro FS, Pimentel AM, Mattos RC, Rechsteiner SM da EF. Utilização de leite com diferentes concentrações de gordura como diluentes para sêmen equino refrigerado. Ci Anim Bras. 2020;21:e-44262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v21e-44262

Murugesan S, Ramasamy K. Effect of semen parameters on duration of fertility in layer breeder chicken. Indian J Poult Sci. 1o de abril de 2020;55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8180.2020.00010.0

Bustani GS, Baiee FH. Semen extenders: An evaluative overview of preservative mechanisms of semen and semen extenders. Vet World. maio de 2021;14(5):1220–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1220-1233

Partyka A, Niżański W. Advances in storage of poultry semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 1o de novembro de 2022;246:106921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106921

Blesbois E. Biological Features of the Avian Male Gamete and their Application to Biotechnology of Conservation. J Poult Sci. 2012;49(3):141–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.011120

Peixoto JV. CRIOPRESERVAÇÃO DE SÊMEN E AVALIAÇÃO HISTOLÓGICA E FUNCIONAL DO TESTÍCULO DE PERIQUITOS AUSTRALIANOS (Melopsittacus undulatus SHAW, 1805) [Internet] [Tese]. [Viçosa, MG]: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2010. Disponível em: https://locus.ufv.br/items/a6e93a7e-4bfa-45ea-a9d2-212b5fcddd3a/full

Rutz F, Anciuti MA, Xavier EG, Roll VFB, Rossi P. Avanços na fisiologia e desempenho reprodutivo de aves domésticas. Rev Bras Reprod Anim. setembro de 2007;31(3):307–17.

Janosikova M, Petricakova K, Ptacek M, Savvulidi FG, Rychtarova J, Fulka J. New approaches for long-term conservation of rooster spermatozoa. Poult Sci. 1o de fevereiro de 2023;102(2):102386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102386

Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal, organizador. Manual para exame andrológico e avaliação de sêmen animal. 3. ed. Belo Horizonte: CBRA; 2013. 104 p.

Pimprasert M, Kheawkanha T, Boonkum W, Chankitisakul V. Influence of Semen Collection Frequency and Seasonal Variations on Fresh and Frozen Semen Quality in Thai Native Roosters. Anim Open Access J MDPI. 6 de fevereiro de 2023;13(4):573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040573

Braga P. Relação do tempo de armazenamento dos espermatozoides no oviduto de peruas com a fertilidade e desenvolvimento embrionário [Internet]. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/18883

Novaes GA. Utilização da terapia fotodinâmica antimicrobiana no sêmen de galos domésticos: análise de diferentes tempos de pré-irradiação, irradiância e exposição radiante da luz [Internet] [Mestrado em Reprodução Animal]. [São Paulo]: Universidade de São Paulo; 2021 [citado 27 de fevereiro de 2025]. Disponível em: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/10/10131/tde-15032022-115047/

Kumar Sarkar P. Motility, Viability and Fertilizing Ability of Avian Sperm Stored Under in Vitro Conditions. Rev Agric Sci. 2020;8:15–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.8.0_15

Bongalhardo DC. Produção e preservação do sêmen de galos. Rev Bras Reprod Anim. junho de 2013;37(2):131–5.

Burrows WH, Quinn JP. The Collection of Spermatozoa from the Domestic Fowl and Turkey. Poult Sci. 1o de janeiro de 1937;16(1):19–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0160019

Khaeruddin K, Srimaharani S. Use of Old Coconut Water with Various Skim Concentrations of Milk as a Diluent for Kampong Chicken Semen. Chalaza J Anim Husb. 1o de julho de 2019;4(1):24–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/chalaza.v4i1.921

Chankitisakul V, Boonkum W, Kaewkanha T, Pimprasert M, Ratchamak R, Authaida S, et al. Fertilizing ability and survivability of rooster sperm diluted with a novel semen extender supplemented with serine for practical use on smallholder farms. Poult Sci. 1o de dezembro de 2022;101(12):102188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102188

Getachew T, Goshu G, Lemma A. Effects of Using Commercial and Homemade Extenders on Sperm Quality of Liquid Stored Semen of Horro Chicken Breed. J Worlds Poult Res. 25 de junho de 2023;2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2023.24

SAS Institute Inc. All Rights Reserved. [Internet]. Disponível em: https://www.sas.com/pt_br/home.html

Santiago-Moreno J, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, Coloma M, López-Sebastián A, Prieto M, et al. Influence of Season on the Freezability of Free-Range Poultry Semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47(4):578–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01921.x

Zong Y, Li Y, Sun Y, Mehaisen GMK, Ma T, Chen J. Chicken Sperm Cryopreservation: Review of Techniques, Freezing Damage, and Freezability Mechanisms. Agriculture. fevereiro de 2023;13(2):445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020445

Ola SI, Faleye O, Adeyemi A, Adeyosoye O. Evaluation of Egg Yolk Plasma as Replacement for Whole Egg Yolk in Chicken Semen Extender. J Poult Res. 30 de dezembro de 2020;17(2):96–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.739916

Santiago-Moreno J, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, Coloma MA, López-Sebastián A, Prieto MT, et al. Cryoprotective and contraceptive properties of egg yolk as an additive in rooster sperm diluents. Cryobiology. 1o de dezembro de 2012;65(3):230–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.06.008

Rakha BA, Ansari MS, Akhter S, Santiago-Moreno J, Blesbois E. Cryoprotectant effects of egg yolk on Indian red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) sperm. Theriogenology. 1o de outubro de 2018;119:150–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.06.015

Abouelezz FMK, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, Esteso MC, López-Sebastián A, Campo JL, et al. Sperm–egg penetration assay assessment of the contraceptive effects of glycerol and egg yolk in rooster sperm diluents. Theriogenology. 1o de junho de 2015;83(9):1541–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.02.002

Appiah MO, Li W, Zhao J, Liu H, Dong Y, Xiang J, et al. Quercetin supplemented casein-based extender improves the post-thaw quality of rooster semen. Cryobiology. 1o de junho de 2020;94:57–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.04.010

Mocé E, Blanch E, Tomás C, Graham J. Use of Cholesterol in Sperm Cryopreservation: Present Moment and Perspectives to Future. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45(s2):57–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01635.x

Chuaychu-noo N, Thananurak P, Chankitisakul V, Vongpralub T. Supplementing rooster sperm with Cholesterol-Loaded-Cyclodextrin improves fertility after cryopreservation. Cryobiology. 1o de fevereiro de 2017;74:8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.12.012

Partyka A, Niżański W. Supplementation of Avian Semen Extenders with Antioxidants to Improve Semen Quality—Is It an Effective Strategy? Antioxidants. dezembro de 2021;10(12):1927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10121927

Figueiredo EAPD, Sousa FMD, Guidoni AL, Rosa PS. Comparação de diluentes, diluições e tempo de armazenamento do sêmen sobre fertilidade, eclodibilidade e nascimento de pintos em matrizes pesadas. Rev Bras Zootec. 1999;28(6):1239–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35981999000600010

Tabatabaei S. The Effect of Spermatozoa Number on Fertility Rate of Chicken in Artificial Insemination Programs. J Anim Vet Adv - J ANIM VET ADV. 1o de dezembro de 2010;9:1717–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1717.1719

Bui HYT, Nakamura Y, Takenouchi A, Tsudzuki M, Maeda T. Timing and Interval Effects of Repeated Inseminations by Roosters on the Fathering of Chicks. J Poult Sci. 2018;55(4):301–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0170208

Saleh DM, Mugiyono S, Sumaryadi MY, Nugroho AP. The Effects of Sperm Number and Insemination Interval on the Fertility and Hatchability of Sentul Hens. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. novembro de 2019;372(1):012037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/372/1/012037

Mohan J, Sharma SK, Kolluri G, Dhama K. History of artificial insemination in poultry, its components and significance. Worlds Poult Sci J. 1o de setembro de 2018;74(3):475–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000430

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

1.
Lima MW, Lopes Claudio F, Azis Garcia de Araújo W, César Oliveira Dias J. AVALIAÇÃO IN VIVO DE DIFERENTES DILUENTES COMERCIAIS NA REPRODUÇÃO DE GALOS DA RAÇA ÍNDIO GIGANTE (Gallus Gallus Domesticus). RVZ [Internet]. 2025 Apr. 10 [cited 2025 Dec. 5];32:1-14. Available from: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/1684

Issue

Section

Original Articles