PERCEPTION OF ANIMAL PROTEIN CONSUMERS ON THE STATE OF PRODUCTION ANIMALS IN THE CITY OF PARAUAPEBAS, PARÁ, BRAZIL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2021.v28.484

Keywords:

food, quality certification, consumer.

Abstract

The objective was to assess the level of knowledge of consumers of products of animal origin regarding the welfare of farm animals, in the city of Parauapebas-Pará, Brazil. Questionnaires containing ten questions related to the theme of animal welfare were applied, totaling 342 respondents, chosen at random, considering four questions of a socioeconomic nature, whose respondents were organized into six educational levels and five levels of family income. The research was carried out in fairs, butchers, mini markets and two large supermarket chains in the city of Parauapebas, in different neighborhoods, to reach audiences with different levels of income and who were, preferably, consuming or purchasing products of animal origin. The collected data were analyzed by a non-parametric test of significance at 5%. It was noticed that consumers with better education and higher income are willing to pay for a product of better quality and durability and believe that with the advance of knowledge in relation to well-being, certified products have become more accessible less favored consumers.

References

1. Schaly LM, Oliveira MC, Salviano PAP, Abreu JM. Percepção do consumidor sobre bem-estar de animais de produção em Rio Verde, GO. Pubvet, 2010; 4(38):1982-1263. Acesso em: http://www.pubvet.com.br/uploads/7e8feb0e14d7bece67cb14a9cc12a21a.pdf >.
2. Bennett EL. Is there a link between wild meat and food security? Conservation Biology, 2002; 16:590–592.
3. Molento CFM. Bem-estar e produção animal: aspectos econômicos – revisão. Archives of Veterinary Science, 2005; 10(1):1-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/avs.v10i1.4078
4. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATISTICA. Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira : 2016 / IBGE, Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. - Rio de Janeiro : IBGE, 2016 146 p. - (Estudos e pesquisas. Informação demográfica e socioeconômica, ISSN 1516-3296 ; n. 36) Acesso em: 21 fev 2020.
5. Levin J. (1987). Estatística aplicada a ciências humanas. São Paulo: Harbra.
6. Bonamigo A, Bonamigo CBSS, Molento CFM. Atribuições da carne de frango relevantes ao consumidor: foco no bem-estar animal. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2012; 41(4):1044-1050. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982012000400029
7. Raineri CR, Antonelli N, Prosdocimi C, Simionato De Barros AM, Tarazona, Gameiro AH. Contribution to economic evaluation of systems that value animal welfare at farm. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 2012; 25:123-134. Acesso em: <http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rccp/v25n1/v25n1a14.pdf>
8. Pinheiro MC, Gomes FE, Lopes GN. Perfil e preferência de consumo da carne bovina na cidade de Boa Vista-Roraima (RR). Agro@mbiente On-line, 2008; 2(1): 28-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v2i1.157
9. Pedrazzani AS, Molento CFM, Carneiro PCF, Catilho MF. Senciência e bem-estar de peixes: uma visão de futuro do mercado consumidor. Panorama da Aquicultura, 2007; 102, 24-29. Acesso em: https://panoramadaaquicultura.com.br/senciencia-e-bem-estar-de-peixes-uma-visao-de-futuro-do-mercado-consumidor/
10. Barcellos MD. Informação e qualidade na compra de carne bovina. Faces: Revista de Administração, 2004; 3(2):43-59. DOI: doi.org/10.21714/1984-6975FACES2004V3N2ART35.
11. Astiz CS. Calidad de la canal y de la carne ovina y caprina y los gustos de los consumidores. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2008; 37:143-160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300018.
12. Francisco DC, Nascimento VP, Loguercio AP, Camargo L. Caracterização do consumidor de carne de frango em Porto Alegre. Ciência Rural, 2007; 37(1):253-258. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000100041.
13. Velho JP, Barcellos JOJ, Lengler L, Elias SA, Oliveira TE. Disposição dos consumidores porto-alegrenses à compra de carne bovina com certificação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2009; 38:399-404. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000200025
14. Kallio JH. Animal health and animal welfare: Is it the same thing? Acta Veterinary Scand. 2008; 50: S1-S2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S2

Published

2021-03-02

How to Cite

1.
Abreu ML de, Dantas G da S, Silva WC da, Barbosa AVC, Silva JAR da. PERCEPTION OF ANIMAL PROTEIN CONSUMERS ON THE STATE OF PRODUCTION ANIMALS IN THE CITY OF PARAUAPEBAS, PARÁ, BRAZIL. RVZ [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 2 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];28:1-12. Available from: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/484

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)