Use and contribution of chromoendoscopy with lugol, indigo carmine and methylene blue in the upper digestive tract of dogs

Authors

  • Emerson Legatti
  • Sabrina de Almeida Moreira
  • Carolina Quarterone
  • Luiz Carlos Vulcano
  • Sheila Canavese Raha
  • Luiz Eduardo Naresse

Keywords:

chromoendoscopy, dogs, lugol, indigo carmine, methylene blue

Abstract

Chromoendoscopy is defined as the topical application of aqueous dye in the gastrointestinal
tract mucosa. These dyes have the function of showing early or discrete changes which may
go unnoticed in conventional examination. Therefore, this procedure enables altered tissue
collection or monitoring of pre-existing diseases. In Veterinary Medicine, there were no
studies that have used this technique, but there are many conditions in which it can be
employed as research or monitoring of esophagitis (such as humans Barrett's esophagus),
erosive or polypoid gastric lesions and duodenal injuries. In the present study, ten adult dogs
underwent endoscopy (EGD), followed by chromoendoscopy (CRE) and biopsy of
esophagus, stomach (fundus, body and pyloric antrum) and duodenum, when available.
Biopsies were sent for histopathology for identification of presence or absence of lesions in
the collected samples. The aim of this study was to describe the technique of
chromoendoscopy in dogs, evaluate its effectiveness on the identification and delineation of
lesions in the upper digestive tract of dogs and correlate endoscopic findings before and after
application of the technique with histopathologic results. The correlation between EGD and
CRE by histopathology (gold standard) was evaluated using the Kappa test. The results
showed significant agreement in CRE of esophagus with accuracy of 83.33%. Moderate
agreement in conventional endoscopy (CE) of esophagus and CRE of fundus, body and
pyloric antrum were demonstrated with an accuracy of 83.33%, 70%, 70% and 70%
respectively. Fair agreement was found in CRE of stomach, with an accuracy of 70%. There
was poor agreement in EGD of pyloric antrum and EGD and CRE of duodenum, with an
accuracy of 50%, 40% and 40% respectively. There was no correlation between the tests in
the EGD of gastric fundus, gastric body and stomach, with an accuracy of 40%, 40% and
43.33% respectively. CRE is slightly difficult to perform but is effective to guide biopsies of
esophagus and stomach.

References

Fagundes RB. Cromoendoscopia de esôfago e estômago. In Magalhães A.F. SOBED Endoscopia Digestiva Diagnóstica e Terapêutica. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2005. p. 106-119.

Guilford WG. Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. In McCarth TC. Veterinary Endoscopy for the Small Animal Practioner. Beaverton: Elsevier; 2005. p. 279-321.

Fallin EA, Leib MS, Trevor P. Endoscopy case of the month. Med. Lenexa. 1996; 91: p. 41-50.

Lecoindre P, Chevallier M, Peyrol S, Boude M, Labigne A. Pathogenic role of gastric Helicobacter sp in domestic carnivores. Veterinary research [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2013 Jun 29];28(33):207–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9208441.

Araújo IC, Ferreira AR. Infecção por Helicobacter spp em gatos. Rev. Clín. Vet. 2002; 07.

Benevento S, Ferreira AR. Estudo Histopatológico das Gastropatias caninas e felinas. Rev. Bras. Med. Vet. 2002; 24(2): p. 81-84.

WASHABAU RJ, DAY MJ. Esophagus. In Washabau RJ, Day MJ, editors. Canine & Feline Gastroenterology. 1st ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 996.

Ratilal PO, Pires EC, Deus JR, Novais LA. Artigo de Revisão / Review Article CROMOENDOSCOPIA : PORQUÊ COLORIR ? GE - J. Port Gastroenterol. 2002;9:340–6.

Sorbi D, Gostout CJ. Polyp Identification and Marking : Chromoscopy , Tattooing , and Clipping. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2000;2:2–8.

Tams TR. Gastroscopy. In Tams TR. Small Animal Endoscopy. Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2011. p. 97-172.

Moreira EF, Oliveira LA de, Pinto PRA de, Albuquerque W, Carvalho SD, Coelho JCCGP. Projeto Diretrizes: Cromoscopia com lugol na detecção do câncer de esôfago [Internet]. São Paulo; 2008 p. 17. Available from: http://www.sobed.org.br/web/arquivos_antigos/pdf/diretrizes/Cromoscopia.pdf.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics [Internet]. 1977 Mar [cited 2013 May 24];33(1):159–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/843571

Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics [Internet]. segunda ed. Molly Taylor, Daniel Selbert SW, editor. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole; 2011 [cited 2013 Jul 9]. p. 888. Available from: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=-CQtWiJJL0cC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Fundamentals+of+Biostatistics&ots=W1J2ti_vbw&sig=MA2VQGB0P_22q7z4upVEbRCYhQA

Valentine BA. Endoscopic Biopsy Handling And Histopatology. In McCarthy TC. Veterinary Endoscopy For The Small Animal Practioner. 3rd ed. St Lois: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 31-47

Published

2021-06-28

How to Cite

1.
Legatti E, de Almeida Moreira S, Quarterone C, Vulcano LC, Canavese Raha S, Naresse LE. Use and contribution of chromoendoscopy with lugol, indigo carmine and methylene blue in the upper digestive tract of dogs. RVZ [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 28 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];23(1):93-104. Available from: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/629

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>