UTILIZAÇÃO DA MANUFATURA ADITIVA (IMPRESSÃO EM 3D) NO TRATAMENTO DE OSTEOSSARCOMA VERTEBRAL EM CÃO SUBMETIDO A VERTEBRECTOMIA LOMBAR: RELATO DE CASO

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2022.v29.890

Keywords:

Dogs, Surgery, Osteossarcoma, Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is one of the most commonly reported bone neoplasms in veterinary medicine, especially in large and giant breed dogs, and the vertebral form has an important clinical scenario presenting 5% of the total reports. This has an unfavorable prognosis and a short survival time.  The clinical presentation is variable and signs of severe pain to neurological deficits can be observed as a result of progressive spinal cord involvement. The diagnosis can be made by imaging with radiography or computed tomography, and by laboratory analysis of cytopathology or histopathology, the latter being preferable for tumor classification. Partial tumor resection is a palliative form of treatment, indicated in some cases to temporarily relieve clinical signs related to pain and neurological deficits. However, when there is therapeutic possibility, complete excision provides better prognosis and survival time, especially when associated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Through the vertebrectomy procedure, surgical stabilization is necessary and can be performed following the principles for vertebral stabilization due to trauma, with the placement of a vertebral spacer being necessary to prevent spinal collapse. Several materials have been proposed for the manufacture of the spinal spacer. Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, has transformed the concept of rapid prototyping into reality, due to its ability to quickly manufacture specific geometric parts of high complexity, allowing the elaboration of prototypes for pre- or trans-operative use in highly complex orthopedic surgeries. Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), being a high-strength, non-biodegradable, biocompatible and low-cost thermoplastic, is the focus of this work in the development of the vertebral spacer as a stabilizer in a vertebrectomy procedure in a dog.

References

Morello E, Martano M, Buracco P. Biology, diagnosis and treatment of canine appendicular osteosarcoma: similarities and differences with human osteosarcoma. Vet Journal. 2011;189(3):268–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.08.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.08.014

Trost ME, Kommers GD, Brown CC, Barros CSL, Irigoyen LF, Fighera RA, Silva TM. Primary bone neoplasms in dogs: 90 cases. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira. 2012;32 (12):1329–1335. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-736X2012001200018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2012001200018

Ru G, Terracini B, Glickman LT. Host related risk factors for canine osteosarcoma. The Veterinary Journal. 1998;156(1):31–39. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-0233(98)80059-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(98)80059-2

Cooley DM, Beranek BC, Schlittler DL, Glickman NW, Glickman LT, Waters DJ. Endogenous Gonadal Hormone Exposure and Bone Sarcoma Risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2002;11:1434–1440. PMID: 12433723.

Brodey RS. The use of naturally occurring cancer in domestic animals for research into human cancer: general considerations and a review of canine skeletal osteosarcoma. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1979;52:345-361. PMCID: PMC2595482.

Sharp NJH, Wheeler SJ. Small Animal Spinal Disorders – Diagnosis and Surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7234-3209-8.50008-X

Mehl ML, Withrow SJ, Seguin B, Powers BE, Dernell WS, Pardo AD, Park RD. Spontaneous regression of osteosarcoma in four dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2001;219(5):614–617. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2001.219.614

Reinhardt S, Stockhaus C, Teske E, Rudolph R, Brunnberg L. Assessment of cytological criteria for diagnosing osteosarcoma in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 2005;46:65-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2005.tb00294.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2005.tb00294.x

Teixeira LV, Lopes STA, Martins DB, França RT, Fighera RA. Punção aspirativa por agulha fina como método de coleta de material para a histopatologia do osteossarcoma canino. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira. 2010;3:145- 148. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-736X2010000200008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2010000200008

Gladman AS, Garcia-Leiner M, Sauer-Budge AF. Emerging polymeric materials in additive manufacturing for use in biomedical applications. AIMS Bioengineering. 2019;6(1):1-20. DOI: 10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1

Mobbs RJ, Choy WJ, Wilson P, McEvoy A, Phan K, Parr WCH. L5 En-Bloc Vertebrectomy with Customized Reconstructive Implant: Comparison of Patient-Specific Versus Off-the-Shelf Implant. World Neurosurgery. 2018;112:94–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.078

Published

2022-09-27

How to Cite

1.
Augusto Ramos dos Santos C, Gonçalves Martins de Siqueira E, Thizen G. UTILIZAÇÃO DA MANUFATURA ADITIVA (IMPRESSÃO EM 3D) NO TRATAMENTO DE OSTEOSSARCOMA VERTEBRAL EM CÃO SUBMETIDO A VERTEBRECTOMIA LOMBAR: RELATO DE CASO. RVZ [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 27 [cited 2024 May 19];29:1-6. Available from: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/890

Issue

Section

Case Reports