EN COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STANDARD OPG TECHNIQUE AND ITS MODIFICATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2023.v30.1001

Keywords:

OPG, sheep, endoparasites, coproparasitological examination

Abstract

Gastrointestinal parasites are infections established in the gastrointestinal tract and can be caused by parasites such as helminths and coccidia. The diagnosis of these parasites can be performed in several ways and techniques, the best known, practical, and fast being the technique popularly known as the OPG method, which determines the number of parasite eggs per gram of feces to calculate the parasite load of the animal. The OPG, despite being the most used technique, presents a lot of variability in the results and several modifications have been described to improve the efficiency of the technique. Therefore, the objective of this work was to compare modifications of the techniques that result in the number of OPG to determine if any of the modifications equate to the result of the standard technique. For its development, a pool of samples of animals of the sheep species, naturally infected by helminths, was collected; the samples were processed by four modifications of the standard technique, known as the “Modified Gordon and Whitlock Method”, using the McMaster chamber, in order to try to estimate the parasite load of the animals. For each technique, five repetitions were performed using the same homogenized fecal sample, in all repetitions and in all techniques. We concluded that the standard technique proved to be the most efficient and viable technique, since its results differed statistically from the other techniques, even if some modifications produced a smaller amount of residue or required a smaller amount of sample.

References

RAMOS F. et al. Epidemiologia das helmintoses gastrintestinais de ovinos no Planalto Catarinense. Ciên. Rur. 2004; 34(6): 1889-1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782004000600034

AMARANTE AFT. Controle integrado de helmintos de bovinos e ovinos. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2004; 13(1): 68-71.

COSTA FSM. Dinâmica das infecções por helmintos gastrintestinais de bovinos na região do vale do Mucuri, Mg [dissertação]. Belo Horizonte (MG): Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da UFMG; 2007.

WEST DM et al. Estimating the cost of subclinical parasitism in grazing ewes. Small Rum. Res. 2009; 86(1): 84-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.09.024

SUTHERLAND IA, SCOTT I. Gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep and cattle. Biol. and Control. 2010; 242p.

SUAREZ VH. Helminthic control on grazil ruminants and environmental risks in South America. Vet. Res. 2002; 33: 563-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2002039

GIRÃO ES, LEAL JA. Diagnóstico de verminoses em ruminantes. 42th ed. Teresina: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; 1999.

GORDON HM, WHITLOCK HV. A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep feces. J. Coun. Sci. Ind. Res. Anst. 1939; 12: 50-52.

RINALDI L et al. Comparison of individual and pooled faecal samples in sheep for the assessment of gastrointestinal strongyle infection intensity and anthelmintic drug efficacy using McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC. Vet. Paras. 2014; 205(1-2): 216-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.011

AMARANTE AFT & AMARANTE MRV. Advances in the diagnosis of the gastrointestinal nematode infections in ruminants. Braz. Jour. of Vet. Res. and Anim. Sci. 2016; 53:127-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v53i2p127-137

UENO H & GONÇALVES PC. Manual para Diagnóstico das Helmintoses de Ruminantes. 4th ed. Tokyo: JICA; 1998.

TAYLOR MA. Parasitologia veterinária. 4ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2017. Diagnóstico laboratorial de parasitismo: método de mcmaster modificado melhorado. p. 254.

MONTEIRO SG. Parasitologia na Medicina Veterinária. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Roca; 2017. Técnicas laboratoriais.. Cap. 33, 334-343.

MOLENTO MB, NICIURA SCM, CHAGAS ACS. Protocolos básicos de laboratório para a realização de metodologias fenotípicas e genotípicas. In: MOLENTO MB. MANUAL PRÁTICO: Metodologias de diagnóstico da resistência e de detecção de substâncias ativas em parasitas de ruminantes; 2011. p. 117-153.

SANDES HMM et al. Comparação entre a técnica de sheather modificada e a técnica de opg no exame coproparasitológico de ovinos. In: XI JORNADA DE ENSINO, PESQUISA E EXTENSÃO – JEPEX 2011, 11., 2011, Recife. JEPEX 2011. Recife: Ufrpe, 2011. p. 1-3.

SANTOS KR et al. 2020. Comparação entre três técnicas coproparasitológicas na investigação de parasitos intestinais de seres humanos. Revis. Elet. Acerv. Saú. 2020; (52). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e3521.2020

ABIDU-FIGUEIREDO M, REINECKE RK, SERRAFREIRE NM. 2008. Comparação entre três técnicas coproparasitológicas para a contagem de ovos de nematóides gastrintestinais de suínos. Revis. de Ciên. & Tecno. 2008; 8(1).

Published

2023-01-10

How to Cite

1.
Santos Cardoso T, Taipeiro Corrêa G, Grando TH, Caramori CH, Braz PH. EN COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STANDARD OPG TECHNIQUE AND ITS MODIFICATIONS. RVZ [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 10 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];30:1-6. Available from: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/1001

Most read articles by the same author(s)