Technique for identifying eggs of Dioctophyme renale in cat urine, employed in silica

Authors

  • Alexsander Ferraz Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Bruna dos Santos Pires Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Tainá Ança Evaristo Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Soliane Carra Perera Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Leandro Quintana Nizoli Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • josaine Cristina da Silva Rapetti Universidade Federal de Pelotas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2020.v27.486

Keywords:

parasite, kidneys, diagnosis, felines.

Abstract

Dioctofimatosis is a parasitic disease caused by the helminth Dioctophyme renale, having as definitive hosts, dogs, cats, wild animals and also man, as this parasite has zoonotic potential.  It affects the kidneys of its definitive hosts, usually the right, but can also be found in other places. Although a higher occurrence of cases in dogs has been described, there are also reports of this parasitosis in cats. One of the ways of diagnosing the disease is through the visualization of D. renale eggs through the urine exam. However, due to the behavioral characteristics of cats, urine collection in this species is difficult to perform. Therefore, through the study of techniques to search for eggs of this parasite in the urine of cats in silica, present in litter boxes, we seek to facilitate the diagnosis in these animals. To carry out this work, silica samples were contaminated with urine containing D. renale eggs. The techniques used for egg research were: centrifugal-flotation in glycosated hypersaturated solution, in two densities: 1,230g/ml and 1,275g/ml; spontaneous fluctuation in glycosated hypersaturated solution, in two densities: 1.230g/ml and 1.275g/ml and centrifugal-sedimentation. The evaluation of the samples was carried out at different times, distributed as follows: time zero, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 120 hours, 168 hours, 240 hours and 336 hours after contamination of the material. The centrifugal-sedimentation technique showed the best result, making it possible to identify morphologically viable eggs from D. renale during the 14 days of analysis.

Author Biographies

Alexsander Ferraz, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Médico Veterinário, Especialista em Doenças e Zoonoses Parasitárias, Doutorando do Programa de Pós Graduação em Veterinária da UFPel.

Bruna dos Santos Pires, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Médica Veterinária, Residente Multiprofissional na área de Clinica Cirurgica de animais de companhia na Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Tainá Ança Evaristo, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Graduanda do curso de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Soliane Carra Perera, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Médica Veterinária, doutora pelo Programa de Pós Graduaçao em Veterinária da UFPel

Leandro Quintana Nizoli, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Médico Veterinário, Doutor, Docente do curso de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Veterinária Preventiva

josaine Cristina da Silva Rapetti, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Médica Veterinária, Doutora, Docente do curso de Medicina Veterinária da Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Departamento de Clinicas Veterinária

References

1. Monteiro SG, Sallis ESV, Satainki DR. Infecção natural por trinta e quatro helmintos da espécie Dioctophyme renale (Goeze, 1782) em um cão. Revista da FZVA. 2002;9(1):29-32. http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fzva/article/view/2149
2. Colpo CB, Silva AS, Monteiro SG. Occurrence of Dyoctophyma renale in dogs in the municipal disctrict of Uruguaiana – RS. Revista da FZVA. 2007;14(2):175-178. http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fzva/article/view/2509
3. Perera SC, Capella GA, Pinto NB, Rappeti JCS, Muller G, Azambuja RHM, Giordani C, Cleff MB. First isolation of Dioctophyme renale eggs from an urban environment and identification of those from animal urine. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2017;26(1):89-91. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpv/v26n1/1984-2961-rbpv-S1984-29612016064.pdf
4. Alves GC, Silva DT, Neves MF. Dioctophyma renale: o parasita gigante do rim. Rev. cient. eletrônica med. vet. 2007;4:1-6. http://www.faef.revista.inf.br/imagens_arquivos/arquivos_destaque/fPXZwNY3BuYYQ8A_2013-5-24-11-38-31.pdf
5. Measures LN, Anderson RC. Centrarchid fish as paratenic hosts of the giant kidney worm, Dioctophyme renale (GOEZE, 1782), in Ontario, Canada. J Wildl Dis. 1985;21(1):11-19. : https://www.jwildlifedis.org/doi/pdf/10.7589/0090-3558-21.1.11
6. Pereira BJ, Girardelli GL, Trivilin LO. Ocorrência de Dioctofimose em cães do município de Cachoeiro do Itapemirim, Espírito Santo, Brasil, no período de maio a dezembro de 2004. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2006;15(3):123-125. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=397841459007
7. Poppi, F.P.; Barcante JMP, Barcante TA. Primeiro relato de Dioctophyma renale parasitando o rim direito de um cão procedente do município de Poços de Caldas/ MG. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2004;13(supl.1):274.
8. Leite LC. Lesões anato patológicas presentes na infecção por Dioctophyme renale (GOEZE, 1782) em cães domésticos (Canis familiaris, Linnaeus, 1758). Arch. vet. sci. 2005;10(1):95-101. https://revistas.ufpr.br/veterinary/article/view/4091/3318
9. Rappeti JCS, Mascarenhas CS, Perera SC, Muller G, Grecco FB, Silva LMC, Sapin CF, Rausch SF, Cleff MB. Dioctophyme renale (Nematoda: Enoplida) in domestic dogs and cats in the extreme south of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2017;26(1): 119-121. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpv/v26n1/1984-2961-rbpv-S1984-29612016072.pdf.
10. Marques LZ, Barros BAF, Gaudêncio FN, Rocha CNC, Batista LCSO. Dioctofimose em um cão proveniente do município de Valença, RJ: Relato de caso. Acta Biomed. Bras. 2016;7(2):116-120. https://www.actabiomedica.com.br/index.php/acta/article/view/149
11. Rocha MF, Padilha VS, Córdova RA, Marcondes MB. Dioctophyma renale em testículo de cão no município de curitibanos, SC, Brasil – Relato de caso. Rev. Ciên. Vet. Saúde Públ. 2018;5(2):208-219. http://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/41598/pdf.
12 Pedrassani D, Wendt H, Rennau EA, Pereira ST, Wendt SBT. Dioctophyme renale Goeze, 1782 in a cat with a supernumerary kidney. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2013;23(1):109-117. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpv/v23n1/0103-846x-rbpv-23-01-109.pdf
13. Silva CC, Cavalcanti GAO, Braga FVA, Guim TN, Gomes LGS, Rappeti JCS. Dioctophyme renale parasitism in domestic cat in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil – first reported case. Semina: Ciênc. Agrár. 2017;38(4):2215-2220. http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25974.
14. Sapin CF, Silva-Mariano LC, Piovesan AD, Fernandes CG, Rappeti JCS, Braga FVA, Cavalcante GA, Rosenthal BM, Grecco FB. Estudo anatomopatológico de rins parasitados por Dioctophyme renale em cães. Acta sci. vet. 2017;45:1-7. http://www.ufrgs.br/actavet/45/PUB%201441.pdf.
15. Cottar BH, Dittrich G, Ferreira AA, Carvalho ACP, Albernaz VGP, Luz MT. Achados ultrassonográficos de cães parasitados por Dioctophyma renale: estudo retrospectivo. Vet. Zootec. 2012;19(1 supl 1):8-11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277150497_ACHADOS_ULTRASSONOGRAFICOS_DE_CAES_PARASITADOS_POR_Dioctophyma_renale_-_ESTUDO_RETROSPECTIVO
16. Li G, Liu C, Li F, Zhou M, Liu X, Niu Y. Fatal bilateral dioctophymatosis. J Parasitol. 2010;96(6):1152- 1154, 2010.
17. Stainki DR, Pedrozo JCSR, Gaspar LFJ, Zanete RA, Silva AS, Monteiro SG. Urethral obstruction by Dioctophyma renale in puppy. Comp Clin Pathol. 2011;20(5):535-537.
18. Caye P, Milech V, Lima CS, Braga FVA, Cleff MB, Rappeti JCS, Cavalcanti GAO. Intramuscular Dioctophyme renale Surgically Removed from Dog- Rare Case Report. Sch J Agric Vet Sci. 2018;5(5):266-269. http://saspjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/SJAVS-55-266-269-c.pdf
19. Lanusse CE. Farmacologia dos compostos anti-helmínticos. In: CHARLES, T.P. Controle de nematóides gastrintestinais em ruminantes. Terezinha Padilha, Juiz de Forra, 1996, p.1-44.
20. Pedrassani D, Hopper EGL, Avancini N. Morphology of eggs of Dioctophyme renale Goeze, 1782 (Nematoda: Dioctophymetidae) and influences of temperature on development of first-stage larvae in the eggs. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2009;18(1):15-19. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpv/v18n1/a03v18n1.pdf.
21. Measures LN. Dioctophymatosis. In: Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA. Parasitic diseases of wild mammals. Iowa,University Press, 2001, p.357-364.
22. Birchard SJ, Sherding RG. Manual Saunders: Clínica de Pequenos Animais 2° ed. São Paulo: Roca; 2003.

Published

2020-11-03

How to Cite

1.
Ferraz A, dos Santos Pires B, Ança Evaristo T, Carra Perera S, Quintana Nizoli L, da Silva Rapetti josaine C. Technique for identifying eggs of Dioctophyme renale in cat urine, employed in silica. RVZ [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 3 [cited 2024 Dec. 17];27:1-8. Available from: https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/486

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)